Norwich Reformed Church
A REFUGE FOR THE GUILTY RACE*
Amyraldian Features in Welsh Calvinism
AMYRALDIAN ASSOCIATION
Affirming Calvin’s Authentic Biblical Christianity
NINTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
Attleborough Baptist Church
Norfolk
11-12 APRIL 2013
*derived from words by William Williams, Pantycelyn
THE THINKING BEHIND THE THEME
Building
on the discoveries of previous conferences, we extend our
investigations to Wales, this year being the tercentenary of the birth
of the eminent Calvinistic Methodist preacher Daniel Rowland (1713-90).
At its most basic, our conference seeks to highlight the theme shared by
this year’s Banner of Truth Ministers’ Conference: ‘The Gospel: What it
is and Why it matters’. However, despite our appeal to Banner
publications, most brethren at Leicester are unlikely to share our
stance. Since the Bible makes it clear that the Gospel of Christ has a
global reach (Matt. 28: 19; Mk. 16: 15; Jn.3: 16), no member of the
human race is to be denied the message of mercy, even though many reject
it. True, only a portion of humanity will be saved—God’s elect. It is
equally true that the provision and offer of pardon are universal.
Otherwise there is no ‘Good News for every creature’. Hence our
Saviour’s atoning death has a ‘double reference’: to all mankind in
general and to the believing elect in particular. This ‘duality’ is
basic to the Amyraldian view of the Gospel.
WHAT ARE ‘AMYRALDIAN FEATURES’?
During
his heresy trial at the National Synod of Alençon (1637), Moïse Amyraut
declared that ‘Jesus Christ died for all men sufficiently, but for the
elect only effectually: and that consequentially his intention was to
die for all men in respect of the sufficiency of his satisfaction, but
for the elect only in respect of its quickening and saving virtue and
efficacy; which is to say, that Christ’s will was that the sacrifice of
his cross should be of an infinite price and value, and most abundantly
sufficient to expiate the sins of the whole world; yet nevertheless the
efficacy of his death appertains only unto the elect;...for this was the
most free counsel and gracious purpose both of God the Father, in
giving his Son for the salvation of mankind, and of the Lord Jesus
Christ, in suffering the pains of death, that the efficacy thereof
should particularly belong unto all the elect, and to them only…’ (John
Quick, Synodicon in Gallia Reformata, 1692, ii. 354).
It is our conviction that, contrary to ‘received
wisdom’, these ‘Amyraldian features’ were present in Welsh Calvinism,
especially among the Calvinistic Methodists. The distinguished author Dr
Eifion Evans helps set the scene for us. The North Wales Methodist
leader, Thomas Jones of Denbigh’s ‘great contribution lay in steering
the Methodism of the [19th] century safely between the rocks of
Arminianism and High Calvinism...both Thomas Jones and Thomas Charles
[Bala] were following in the tradition of Rowland and Williams’ (Daniel Rowland and the Great Evangelical Awakening in Wales, Edinburgh: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1985, 339).
‘High Calvinism’ is properly defined as the theology
of Theodore Beza, the Westminster Confession and John Owen, as distinct
from the original teaching of John Calvin which Amyraut claimed to
reaffirm as ‘authentic Calvinism’. Losing Calvin’s biblical balance,
‘High Calvinism’ was the prelude to the antinomian hypercalvinism which
blighted Wales for a while, as it did England and elsewhere. In short,
the Owenite ‘limited atonement’ teaching created evangelistic and
pastoral havoc, as it still does.
This year’s conference examines the theological, devotional and practical significance of the following summary:
The
Methodist Fathers were never, at first, Hyper-Calvinists,...The
doctrine that was undoubtedly believed among them was that of the
Articles of the Established Church, and in agreement with these they
preached Jesus Christ as a sufficient Saviour for the whole world,
inviting all to him. One need only read the journal of Howell Harris,
the sermons of Daniel Rowland, and the hymns of William Williams, to see
that they laid down no limits to the value of the Saviour's sacrifice.
But just as one extreme always produces the opposite, many of the
Calvinists, in the warmth of their zeal against the Wesleyans, claimed
that there was no universal aspect to the call of the gospel; that the
elect alone were to be called…
John Morgan Jones & William Morgan, tr. John Aaron, The Calvinistic Methodist Fathers of Wales (Edinburgh: The Banner of Truth Trust, 2008), ii. 605. (ACC)
No comments:
Post a Comment