Churches
tend to see themselves as possessing an authority that is higher than the Word of God. Indeed, most major churches see
themselves first as religious denominations or systems or institutions, and
only secondly as Christian churches. They
admire and relish their power and authority, their position and prestige. They enjoying disobeying the clear command of
Christ, and ‘lord it over the flock,’ including Gospel ministers, and holding
them in a kind of servile fear. This is
disguised in very spiritual language as “submission in the Lord to the courts
of the Church.” They demand submission
to their authority, regardless of whether or not it has Scriptural
warrant. They expect ministers to submit
conscience, not to the Word of God, but to their dictates, and when the
minister refuses to submit conscience to any authority but the Word of God – as
his ordination vows require – he is sacked.
The
Christian faith is defined in their terms, and at their will and pleasure, and
not by the Word of God. So to submit to
such “scurrilous authority,” as Calvin describes it, can only be done if “we
are prepared willingly and knowingly to deny Christ.” Hence, there is no reason for any thinking
person to object that some are prepared to distrust these ecclesiastical
authorities.
But
why is it that so many ministers will give their agreement either willingly or
gladly according to their inclinations, or from ambition, or out of fear, to
the ecclesiastical dictators? Because
keeping in with the church authorities is more important to them than keeping in
with Christ. As Calvin said of the church
authorities in his day, “they are so enamoured with their own depraved state,
that they cannot bear any reformation,” (Comm. 1st Peter, 1551:222).
Let
me give two or three examples of where this is seen. First,
when a minister is convinced that there is no place in the public worship of
God revealed in Scripture for the modern innovation of the giving of children’s
addresses, or indeed in the reformed liturgy of Geneva – where traditional Presbyterianism
finds its roots; and when he submits his conscience to no other authority but
the Word of God, but is required by Presbytery to violate his conscience, and
to break the most solemn holy vow not to do this, he is then introduced to an
ecclesiastical process that will lead inevitably to his dismissal.
From
a personal perspective, and from painful personal experience which still burns
sorely, when I found myself in this situation, not one ministerial colleague
was prepared to stand with me or defend me and go against the Presbytery and
only one spoke in my favour against the decision of the powerful Judicial
Commission of the General Assembly, why?
Because those who hung me out to dry had already willingly and knowingly
denied Christ. As a result, I have had
“to drink the cup of perpetual silence,” (Calvin).
Second, where unregenerate lawyers
within the local congregation bring such pressure upon a Gospel minister and
upon their Presbytery, to remove Gospel preaching from their congregation, the
Presbytery caves in, surrenders to legal blackmail, and accommodates these
godless lawyers. Why was this done by
Presbytery? Because the elders there –
both teaching and ruling – had already denied Christ in their hearts!
Third, examples could be given
of the difficulties of ministers who oppose the ordination of women to the
eldership being pressurised to say nothing, or to withdraw from services where
such unbiblical ordinations take place.
Opposition to unbiblical ecumenism by reformed ministers – which is
non-existent in today’s decadent church – is met with secret plans to effect
their removal from the ministry, and facilitated by evangelical, ‘reformed’
colleagues.
This
is where the church in Ireland
is at today. There is not one minister
known to me who is working for reformation within the churches; they are all
content with how things are. Admittedly
there are a few good ministers in these churches, but none who desire the
reformation of the church according to the Word of God.
You
can draw your own conclusions!
No comments:
Post a Comment