‘POLICY EXCHANGE’ REPORT - SAME SEX MARRIAGE.
AN OPEN LETTER TO COALITION MPs.
Re-defining Marriage – Complex and Expensive. [Part 4]
Apart from a casual reference in the report’s conclusion –
“The law is relatively easy and inexpensive to change in this area”, the
economic and administrative changes required for homosexual
"marriage" are ignored by Policy Exchange, perhaps for obvious
reasons to do with some real political and economic implications. But many
others reach an entirely different conclusion for, as Peter Saunders of the
Christian Medical Fellowship points out, “Redefining marriage will be
expensive, would have complicated policy implications, would have bewildering
effects on the English language and lead to further unfairness.”
The change “could cost £Billions, and involve amending
hundreds of pieces of government legislation. The word ‘marriage’ appears 3,258
times in UK legislation, which underlines the central role the institution plays
in national law. Introducing SSM is a legal can of worms which cannot be
achieved without changing the legal and common definition of the word marriage,
and other words which define it (e.g. ‘husband and wife’, ‘consummation’, and
‘adultery’). These changes will inevitably change the definition and nature of
marriage for opposite sex couples by trying to accommodate these two different
kinds of relationship under one legal umbrella.” (3).
If, as it is suggested, civil partnerships become open to
heterosexuals and marriage open to same-sex couples then even the leading
homosexual advocates admits this would cost about £5 billion.
How can the government’s proposals be justified at a time of
deep national debt and economic recession? In terms of cost alone and the
additional complex administrative changes SSM must be seen as an expensive
irrelevance which must not shape public policy. The fact that Policy Exchange
fails to recognise and include these aspects in their report is a serious
omission.
REFERENCES:
REFERENCES:
3. www.cmf.org.uk Christian Medical Fellowship. Article:
Peter Saunders: ‘Why not legalise same-sex marriage?
No comments:
Post a Comment