Scottish theologian James Denney, DD, made a
significant contribution to New Testament scholarship with his books, numerous
articles, lectures and correspondence. Study reveals that his theology has been influenced by philosophy,
not least in the place he has given to empiricism. It can be demonstrated how, overall, this has had a negative impact on his
theology, resulting in his practice being superior to his theory (theology) in
some places, notably, in his doctrine of the Scriptures, revelation, and the
Holy Spirit. Nor has his understanding
of eschatology escaped this influence.
Given
the historical climate in which he grew up and taught, it is not surprising
that he imbibed the humanism that emanated from Germany scholarship. His tendency towards existentialism and his
criticisms of theological liberalism were noted, especially that promoted by
Albrecht Ritschl.
Denney’s
doctrine of the inspiration of Scripture is examined along with his understanding
of the Holy Spirit, Whom he does not think is a Person in the same way as the
Father and the Son are Persons. One
conclusion drawn from this discovery is that much more attention must be paid
to the work of the Holy Spirit in formulations of the doctrine of
Scripture. This lack has adversely
affected Denney’s doctrine of Scripture.
Research recognises and demonstrates that Denney’s handling of Scripture is
superior to his doctrine of Scripture, a fact for which we must be
grateful.
No comments:
Post a Comment