Denney’s Doctrine of Scripture

Scottish theologian James Denney, DD, has made a significant contribution to New Testament scholarship with his books, numerous articles, lectures and correspondence.  His theology has been influenced by philosophy, not least in the place he has given to empiricism.  This has had a negative impact on his theology, resulting in his practice being superior to his theory (theology) in some places, notably, in his doctrine of the Scriptures, revelation, and the Holy Spirit.  Nor has his understanding of eschatology escaped this influence.

Indeed, given the historical climate in which he grew up and taught, it is not surprising that he imbibed the humanism that emanated from Germany scholarship.  His tendency towards existentialism and his criticisms of theological liberalism were noted, especially that promoted by Albrecht Ritschl. 

Denney’s doctrine of the inspiration of Scripture is examined along with his understanding of the Holy Spirit, Whom he does not think is a Person in the same way as the Father and the Son are Persons.   Much more attention must be paid to the work of the Holy Spirit in formulations of the doctrine of Scripture.  This lack has adversely affected Denney’s doctrine of Scripture. 

In conclusion, it has been recognised that Denney’s handling of Scripture is superior to his doctrine of Scripture, a fact for which we must be grateful.